News Update

10/recent/ticker-posts

Header Ads Widget

Nigerian Lady Writes An Open Letter To Nollywood Actor Yul & His Estranged Wife May Edochie.


This is an open letter to controversial Nollywood actor Yul and his former wife, May Edochie by a Nigerian lady, Zulu Sylvia Ekomaru and this letter makes a lot of sense for everyone to read.

 

I have decided to school you, perhaps it will help you not to sabotage Rita's chances at the next adjourned date. If you truly want her to win, you need this counsel. Otherwise, you are inadvertently helping Judy secure a complete victory against her.

I know you people are itiboribo, that is why an acclaimed graduate would boldly ask why Judy’s fans didn’t escort her to the courtroom. To do what exactly? To constitute nuisance?

But that is not why I am here. I am here to educate you thoroughly, because it is obvious you lack understanding of legal proceedings.

Listen and learn: Mobilizing your fanbase to court to troll, harass, and intimidate a litigant who sued you has grave legal, strategic, and reputational consequences. Consult a competent lawyer if in doubt.

This is particularly instructive in a defamation and civil action such as the Judy / Rita / Obasi matter:

THE LEGAL IMPLICATION: It can be interpreted as intimidation of the other party.

In law, once a matter is in court, you are expected to allow the court to decide. Mobilizing fans to attack the petitioner/complainant can be seen as:

A). Attempt to pervert the course of justice: You are trying to use public pressure to intimidate the other party into withdrawing the case.

B ). Harassment / Cyberstalking: If the trolling continues offline, it becomes a fresh cause of action. Judy can file a new petition for harassment against Rita right there.

C). Contempt of Court: If the judge sees that you are turning the court premises into a circus or using a crowd to mock the process, the judge can hold you in contempt.

AND THIS WEAKENS YOUR CASE.

Instead of proving your innocence with facts, you are proving malice. It tells the court:

"I don't have a legal defense, so I am resorting to public shaming."

A smart judge will see the pattern. If you claim you didn't bully the person, but you bring 20 people to court to bully her in front of the judge, you have just proven the petitioner's case for them. You made it easy for her.

AGAIN, IT FLIPS PUBLIC SYMPATHY.

This is exactly what is happening now with Rita vs Judy. The world is watching Rita's fans bring cameras to court to film, laugh, shout, and troll Judy. Automatically, sympathy shifts to the person being trolled.

Nigerians naturally detest oppression. Once the public perceives you as the bully using numbers to oppress one person, they will start defending the victim, even if they never liked the victim before.

SECURITY IMPLICATION OF WHAT YOU ARE DOING.

The court has a duty to protect all parties. If your fans constitute a threat, the other party can ask the court for protection, and the court can order your fans to be barred from the premises, or ask security to escort the other party out. Watch the next hearing, it may be difficult for you people to even enter.

SUMMARILY, In law, you fight your battle with evidence, not with crowd.

If you bring a crowd to troll someone who sued you, legally you are creating a second offence, strategically you are destroying your own defence, and socially you are turning your opponent into a hero and a martyr.

The most sensible option is to advise your fans to stay away from the case, stay off the other party’s page, and allow your lawyer to speak for you in court.

This is why JUDY AUSTIN is the WISEST/SMARTEST PERSON among the parties involved. Babes knows what she is doing 

Post a Comment

0 Comments