 |
| Nnamdi Kanu. |
Governors, ministers, and former military chiefs are among the prominent figures listed by the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, as witnesses in his ongoing terrorism trial.
The IPOB leader, whose no-case submission was recently dismissed by Justice James Omotosho, is set to begin presenting his defence in court.
Among the 23 witnesses named by Kanu are Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike, Minister of Works David Umahi, former Army Chiefs Gen. Theophilus Danjuma and Gen. Tukur Buratai.
Others listed include Imo State Governor Hope Uzodinma, Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, former Abia State Governor Okezie Ikpeazu, former Attorney General of the Federation Abubakar Malami, Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS) Oluwatosin Ajayi, his predecessor Yusuf Bichi, and former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) Ahmed Rufai Abubakar.
In a document he personally signed and filed on Tuesday, Kanu requested the court to extend the six days previously granted for his defence to 90 days.
At the last hearing, Justice Omotosho approved Kanu’s request to have a private session with his legal team on October 22 in the Federal High Court in Abuja, in preparation for the start of his defence scheduled for today.
In the document, Kanu classified his witnesses into two groups: “ordinary, but material defence witnesses (voluntary)” and “material and vital witnesses (to be summoned under Section 232 of the Evidence Act 2011).”
He also stated his intention to testify personally in court.
According to the filing, Kanu said he intends to call Wike “to testify on the Obigbo Massacre, following the EndSARS protests and the role of security forces under his authority.”
He noted that Uzodinma is “to testify on public statements, following Ahmed Gulak’s death and subsequent clarification exonerating IPOB.”
Kanu stated that Gen. Danjuma would “testify on his 2018 public warning, urging self-defence against infiltrated armed forces, contextualizing the defendant’s advocacy for self-defence.”
He said Buratai would “testify on the 2017 invasion of the defendant’s residence and the chain of command authorizing the military operation.”
According to Kanu, Sanwo-Olu will “testify on the findings of the Lagos State EndSARS Judicial Panel, particularly the Lekki Toll-Gate massacre, evidencing state patter of repression.”
Umahi, he stated, is expected “to testify regarding the proscription of IPOB without judicial order and its consequences,” while Ikpeazu will “testify on his knowledge and administrative participation in the 2017 military invasion within Abia State.”
Kanu said Malami is expected “to testify on directives and authorizations connected with the defendant’s extraordinary rendition from Kenya in June 2021.”
He added that Ajayi would “clarify on his pubic lectures and statements on terrorists and invaders, relevant to interpreting the defendant’s own broadcasts.”
Kanu noted that Bichi should “testify on knowledge and authorization of rendition operations, custody conditions, and compliance with legal procedures.”
He said Abubakar would “testify on the operational and diplomatic coordination of the rendition.”
Kanu also disclosed that a DSS official, whose identity was not revealed, will be called “to be cross-examined regarding direct involvement in the defendant’s abduction and illegal transfer, fabrication of witness statements, and custodial abuses.”
Among those listed as ordinary witnesses is Chief Emeka Umeagbalasi, described by Kanu as an “expert in political history and self-determination.”
According to the document, Umeagbalasi “will testify on the historical and legal context of self-determination movements (such as IPOB) and their treatment under Nigerian and international law, including extra-judicial killings of the defendant’s associates.”
Mazi Benjamin Madubugwu, identified as an “associate of the defendant and former co-accused,” will “testify to the internal structure and objectives of IPOB, refuting claims that it is a terrorist organisation.”
Chief Dan Ulasi, a community leader from Umuahia, Abia State, is expected “to testify on the perception of the defendant’s broadcasts as political commentary rather than incitement.”
Bruce Fein, described as an international human rights and constitutional lawyer based in Washington, D.C., United States, will “testify on the illegality of the defendant’s extraordinary rendition and its implications for jurisdiction and fair trial.”
Emeritus Professor Martin Aghaji, whom Kanu identified as his “treating physician,” is expected “to testify on the defendant’s medical condition, effects of detention, and fitness to stand trial.”
Barry Sutton, a “digital-security expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts MA, USA,” will “examine the integrity of the electronic evidence, including chain of custody, authenticity, and tampering issues.”
Chief Godwin I. Chionye, described as a “senior lawyer and community elder” from Isiama Afaraukwu Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State, will “testify on the defendant’s good character and standing in his community.”
Prince Emmanuel Kanu of No. 1 Eze Okwu-Kanu Close, Umuahia, Abia State, identified as an “eyewitness to the 2017 military invasion of the defendant’s residence,” will “testify to the events, casualties, and use of excessive force by the army.”
Kanu stated that during his testimony, he would “provide a sworn account of the facts, denying the allegations, and explaining the political context of his statements and actions.”
A portion of the document reads: “Notice of number and names of witnesses to be called by the defendant and request for witness summons/subpoena and the variation of the time within which to defend the counts/charges against the defendant.
“Take notice that pursuant to the order of this honourable court made on the 16th day of October 2025, directing the defendant to commence his defence on the 24th day of October 2025, the defendant shall call a total of twenty three (23) witnesses, divided into two categories, viz:
Category A – ordinary, but material defence witnesses (voluntary).
Category B – vital and compellable witnesses (to be summoned under Section 232 of the Evidence Act, 2011).
“Given the materiality of the prospective evidence of the witnesses slated for the defence of the defendant, the time frame within which the defendant is ordered to present and conduct defence of the charges appears grossly inadequate, hence your lordship is urged to vary the timeframe and accommodate at least a period of 90 days for the defence.
“The Registrar of the court be ordered to issue subpoenas or witness summons on Category B witnesses or be permitted.
“The defendant respectfully prays this honourable court to issue all necessary summonses and witness warrants under Sections 241-242 of the Evidence Act, 2011 and under the inherent jurisdiction.
“The defendant undertakes to provide the sworn statements of all voluntary witnesses to this honourable court and to notify the prosecution within a reasonable time.
“The honourable court to note that the appearance of these witnesses is essential to ensuring a fair and complete determination of the issues before the court and the honourable court and the entirety of Nigeria will enjoy the robust evidence that would surface.
“No precious time of the honourable court would be delayed and it would interest the honourable court and the general public that justice is not only done but manifestly seen to have been done.”
Kanu met privately with his legal team, which included senior lawyers such as Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) and Paul Erokoro (SAN), under the leadership of former Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Kanu Agabi (SAN).
The meeting took place in Court 7, located on the second floor of the Federal High Court headquarters in Abuja — the same courtroom where his terrorism trial is ongoing.
In line with the schedule of proceedings issued by Justice James Omotosho on September 16, the meeting formed part of the defence team’s preparation ahead of the commencement of Kanu’s defence today.
0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of News PLATFORM or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!