![]() |
| Godwin Emefiele. |
Prosecution Witness Seven, PW7, Eneanye Chinedu in the trial of former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, Godwin Emefiele on alleged unlawful printing of new naira notes on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 told the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court, Abuja, presided over by Justice Maryanne Anineh that his team carried out a thorough and nationwide investigation into the matter.
Speaking
under cross-examination by defence counsel, Olalekan Ojo, SAN, the
witness, the Head of Special Duty Committee 3 of the EFCC, told the court that
he coordinated the investigation team alongside other officers he identified as
Buhari, Lanre, Adamu Alhaji and Ganiyu Olaibe.
Confirming
that his evidence-in-chief captured the essential findings of the EFCC’s
investigation, the witness stated that he did not omit any vital aspect of the
investigation.
“As the
head of the team, it is my duty to assign responsibilities and ensure that
proper investigation is carried out. Team leaders also assigned duties to
members under them,” he said. While admitting that he did not personally
interrogate the defendant, he explained that other members of the investigation
team interrogated Emefiele.
“I did not
have any direct interaction with the defendant, but he was interrogated by
members of my team,” he said.
In the
proceedings, the defence counsel requested that Exhibit S1, a television news
report, which highlighted the hardship Nigerians experienced during the naira
redesign policy, be shown to the witness. The witness observed that the
referenced video originated from News Central, a television station and had no
input from the EFCC investigation team.
“I do not
know the date the video was produced, and I do not know the staff of the
station that made the report,” he said, adding that no staff of the station was
interviewed because the video was obtained without third-party input,” he said.
Another
video report on the same subject from TVC, another television station,
was also played in court, with the witness also telling the court that neither
he nor any member of his team interviewed the anchor or presenters in the
video.
Also,
a video showing former Kaduna State governor, Nasir el-Rufai, former Zamfara
State governor, Bello Matawalle, and former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello,
was also played with the witness disassociating himself and his team from the
source of the video, and simply affirmed that his team interviewed members of
the public in the course of their investigation. He further affirmed that all
EFCC zonal offices across the federation, including Abuja and Lagos
participated in the investigation.
“The
Commission has zonal offices across the country. The team visited the Central
Bank of Nigeria and other commercial banks to monitor cash disbursement to the
public,” he said.
A video
from Arise News, a television station was also played, which featured the
defendant. The witness, however, disclosed that the defendant was interviewed
by the EFCC in the course of the investigation.
When shown
Exhibit W, the extra-judicial statements of the defendant, the witness told the
court that Emefiele made several statements to the Commission on different
dates.
“The
defendant made statements on October 26, 27, 30 and 31, 2023, and on November 1
and 2, 2023,” he said.
Responding
to a question on whether he was aware that the defendant claimed that the
former EFCC Chairman, Abdulrasheed Bawa briefed the then President Muhammadu
Buhari on the need for the naira redesign, the witness stated that the EFCC has
no power to initiate such policy decisions.
“The EFCC
does not have the power to do that. What we do is investigate and offer advice.
The defendant did not provide any additional evidence, whether video or audio
to support that claim,” he said. This defendant’s claim is contained on page 30
of his statement.
The
witness further told the court that the investigation extended to the State
House, disclosing that a written response was received and duly read by him as
the leader of the team.
“Yes, my
lord, it was in writing. A memorandum came from the State House, and I read
it,” he said.
An attempt
by the defence to ask whether any executive order was issued by late President
Buhari, questioning the currency redesign drew an objection from prosecution
counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, who argued that the question was speculative and
not based on any allegation against the late President. The objection was
upheld by the court.
When the
question was rephrased, PW7 told the court that he was not aware of any
executive order issued by the late President Buhari in respect of the naira
redesign policy.
Justice
Anineh adjourned the matter till February 3 and 10, and April 1 and 2, 2026,
for continuation of trial. Further hearing dates were fixed for May 11, 12, 13
and 14, and June 9 and 10, 2026.
.jpg)
0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of News PLATFORM or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!