![]() |
| Oby Ezekwesili & Godswill Akpabio. |
The wisest and free advice that the Nigerian Senate, as well as the House of Representatives, can receive from all well-meaning citizens of our country now is to know when to stop playing with fire.
Nigerians
mostly see the Senate as an ignoble and withering institution that delights in
deliberate betrayal of public trust. Our lawmakers at large are well known for
consistently prioritizing personal and partisan interests over constituent
welfare: blocking or watering down reform legislation (electoral reform,
anti-corruption measures, constitutional amendments for devolution of power);
their selfish custom of inflated budgetary allocations for the legislature
while public services collapse; a pattern of confirming clearly unfit nominees
for executive positions in exchange for political favors; and several other
perfidious actions at the public expense.
The Senate
yesterday voted against a proposed amendment to make electronic transmission of
election results mandatory in the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill and then
proceeded to try to deceive Nigerians by claiming that it “did not reject
electronic transmission.”
What the
Senate did yesterday is worse, and their denial is disingenuous. Let us
dispense with euphemisms and doublespeak. What the Senators did in that opaque
Closed Plenary Session yesterday was retain the critical clause- Section 60 of
the Electoral Act 2022, specifically subsection (5) with the current wording:
“the presiding officer shall transfer the results, including the total number
of accredited voters and the results of the ballot, in a manner as prescribed
by the Commission.”
By
deliberately retaining the vague language that leaves the method and timing of
transmitting election results to the discretion of the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC), rather than requiring real-time uploads from
polling units, the Senate has once again weaponized ambiguity in our electoral
law.
The brazen
actions of the Senators were neither an innocent choice nor some sort of
technical oversight. It was also not a neutral legislative compromise of
“letting sleeping dogs lie,” because there must surely be a few of them who
know better, as they are daily in touch with our public reality and the
extremely angry mood of the majority of impoverished citizens who are exhausted
by corruption and bad governance.
Calling a
spade a spade, as I am wont to do, the Senators took a calculated decision
despite their full knowledge of recent history. No reasonable Nigerian is
fooled by the shenanigans of the Senate. Every Nigerian who paid attention to
the 2023 general elections knows that the exact clause the Senate deliberately
reaffirmed yesterday is the same discretionary loophole that was at the center
of the crisis that terribly eroded public trust and fatally damaged the
integrity of our democracy.
Real-time
electronic transmission from polling units was promised in practice but not
enforced in law. When it failed, Nigerians were told to accept “procedural
explanations” instead of verifiable outcomes.
It was
that same clause retained by the Nigerian Senate at their sitting yesterday
that created a gap between what Nigerians were repeatedly reassured would
happen in the 2023 elections and the fiasco that the law permitted INEC to
actually carry out in betrayal of public trust. It was that clause that offered
a badly compromised judiciary the opportunity to pronounce a judgment which
created confusion, distrust, national tension, and delegitimized the government
that was sworn into office.
That gap
nearly pushed the country into turmoil.
For the
Senate to now deliberately preserve the same ambiguity, after witnessing its
consequences, is an act of grave irresponsibility. When lawmakers reject clear,
enforceable safeguards and instead cling to ambiguity, they are not protecting
institutions- they are protecting a predetermined outcome.
Adding
salt to injury, the Senate’s statement that “we did not reject electronic
transmission” while refusing to make it mandatory is political
sleight of hand. Electronic transmission that is optional, discretionary, and
unenforceable is no safeguard at all against the systemic electoral fraud that
has plagued our country with a long history of electoral manipulation and weak
institutional trust.
The Senate
knows that “discretion” does not reassure citizens. That is why Nigerians see
this Senate vote against a legal mandate for electronic transmission of results
for what it is- a willful and deliberate refusal to close the door that was
abused in 2023. This action sends a clear signal to Nigerians that lessons from
2023 have been ignored, that transparency is negotiable, and that those in
power prefer plausible deniability to democratic certainty
No one is
deceived. The Senators must never again insult the intelligence of Nigerians by
pretending this is about “INEC’s independence” or “operational flexibility.”
Institutional independence does not require opacity, and flexibility should
never be a cover for unverifiability. Every serious democracy hardwires
clarity, transparency, and compulsion into its electoral laws precisely to
protect the system from bad actors- especially those in power in the case of
Nigeria.
The 2023
elections tested Nigeria’s cohesion.
Our
country survived not because the system worked well, but because citizens
restrained themselves in the face of deep frustration. If future elections are
again disputed under the cover of discretionary loopholes, responsibility will
be clear.
It will
lie with those who saw the danger, understood it fully, and chose to plunge
Nigerians into it anyway.
I am
certain that by now the Senators have heard the unified stance of Nigerians on
electronic transmission of results since the news of their unpopular decision
was published yesterday and will therefore avoid plunging the country into
crisis.
I am
therefore certain that the Nigerian Senate now knows what it must do
immediately.
Senators,
cancel that emergency two-week break announced today, all return to the Red
Chamber of the National Assembly complex, and in a broadcast Plenary Session,
unanimously pass into law the exact text of the reform that was proposed to the
clause on electronic transmission of results.
For avoidance
of any confusion, here is the exact text of the key proposed provision from the
Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill: “The presiding officer shall
electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to the INEC Result
Viewing Portal (IReV) in real time, and such transmission shall be done after
the prescribed Form EC8A has been signed and stamped by the presiding officer
and, where available, countersigned by candidates or polling unit agents.”
Simple.
It is
not wise to play with fire. Transparency is always better.
Obiageli
“Oby” Ezekwesili
Founder,
SPPG- School of Politics, Policy and Governance
February
5, 2026

0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of News PLATFORM or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!